TY - GEN
T1 - Teaching Integrated Architecture and Urban Design using a Tectonic Attitude as Pedagogical Method
AU - Christiansen, Elias Melvin
PY - 2020/4/4
Y1 - 2020/4/4
N2 - This paper discusses a pedagogical method based on what in this paper is introduced as a tectonicattitude. The methodology is applied to an undergraduate studio called “The relationships betweenarchitectural and urban space”, taught at Aalborg University, Denmark, to 5th semester bachelorstudents of Architecture and Urban Design. The studio is designed to stimulate the students’understanding of context, and to enable their reflection on potentials and challenges in the relationshipsbetween buildings and urban spaces.The studio arises from a reading of the challenges in contemporary building culture, as applied to theconstruction of new cities. Examples can be found across the world of such cities and urbanredevelopments, full of good intentions and sufficient resources but that are experienced as mediocre,disjointed and made up of autonomous buildings of standardised solutions.Theoretically the shape of the contemporary city can be understood as a set of intertwined, global, megatrends. These trends come from a growing awareness of the city’s role in ecosystems and thesustainability movement1 2, an understanding of the city as the spatial facilitator of the good lifeassociated with the notion ‘liveability’3 4, and an increase in the implementation of urban technologiesand smart city solutions5 6. But, these mega trends cannot provide an adequate understanding alone. Aswith everything else, the contemporary city is entangled with economy, which among other thingsincludes crude speculation in the development of the city, a race for increased profit throughstandardised architecture, and a maximising of returns from space available for rent or sale. If the spatialresult of this is autonomous architecture, an excess of standardised architectural solutions and prefabricated apartment blocks not defined by their context, how are we as architects and urban designerssupposed to challenge this tendency? Asteachers of architecture and urban design, our proposed solutionis to approach the challenge through the education of students. The current studio is an attempt in thisdirection.From the perspective of an architect, one of the challenges of contemporary building culture is a lack ofsensitivity towards how the city is experienced, resulting from how the city is put together andassembled. How do we consciously shape the spatial experience in the joining of the new and the oldcity, in the joining of buildings and urban spaces, and in the joining between public and private?Historically in architectural theory, the notion of tectonics has provided an understanding of how spatialexperience is affected by the joining of architectural elements. Can this theory be re-developed to provide a new foundation for an understanding of the relationship between the experience of the cityand how the city is assembled?
AB - This paper discusses a pedagogical method based on what in this paper is introduced as a tectonicattitude. The methodology is applied to an undergraduate studio called “The relationships betweenarchitectural and urban space”, taught at Aalborg University, Denmark, to 5th semester bachelorstudents of Architecture and Urban Design. The studio is designed to stimulate the students’understanding of context, and to enable their reflection on potentials and challenges in the relationshipsbetween buildings and urban spaces.The studio arises from a reading of the challenges in contemporary building culture, as applied to theconstruction of new cities. Examples can be found across the world of such cities and urbanredevelopments, full of good intentions and sufficient resources but that are experienced as mediocre,disjointed and made up of autonomous buildings of standardised solutions.Theoretically the shape of the contemporary city can be understood as a set of intertwined, global, megatrends. These trends come from a growing awareness of the city’s role in ecosystems and thesustainability movement1 2, an understanding of the city as the spatial facilitator of the good lifeassociated with the notion ‘liveability’3 4, and an increase in the implementation of urban technologiesand smart city solutions5 6. But, these mega trends cannot provide an adequate understanding alone. Aswith everything else, the contemporary city is entangled with economy, which among other thingsincludes crude speculation in the development of the city, a race for increased profit throughstandardised architecture, and a maximising of returns from space available for rent or sale. If the spatialresult of this is autonomous architecture, an excess of standardised architectural solutions and prefabricated apartment blocks not defined by their context, how are we as architects and urban designerssupposed to challenge this tendency? Asteachers of architecture and urban design, our proposed solutionis to approach the challenge through the education of students. The current studio is an attempt in thisdirection.From the perspective of an architect, one of the challenges of contemporary building culture is a lack ofsensitivity towards how the city is experienced, resulting from how the city is put together andassembled. How do we consciously shape the spatial experience in the joining of the new and the oldcity, in the joining of buildings and urban spaces, and in the joining between public and private?Historically in architectural theory, the notion of tectonics has provided an understanding of how spatialexperience is affected by the joining of architectural elements. Can this theory be re-developed to provide a new foundation for an understanding of the relationship between the experience of the cityand how the city is assembled?
M3 - Article in proceeding
T3 - AMPS Proceedings Series
SP - 200
EP - 210
BT - AMPS Proceedings Series 17.1.
A2 - Lester, Ellyn
PB - Architecture, Media, Politics, Society
T2 - AMPS: Education, Design and Practice
Y2 - 17 June 2019 through 19 June 2019
ER -