Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

Bent Flyvbjerg

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

7494 Citations (Scopus)
46417 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume12
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)219-245
ISSN1077-8004
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this