TY - JOUR
T1 - Fostering Paradox Resonance: Exploring leaders’ communication of paradoxes during crisis
AU - Nielsen, Rikke Kristine
AU - Cheal, Joe
AU - Pradies, Camille
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The communication from leaders during a time of crisis significantly impacts how the crisis unfolds. Leaders also play a decisive role in fostering either virtuous or vicious dynamics when organizations are torn between competing demands (Smith, 2014). But never has it been more pressing for organizational leaders to be mindful of what and how they communicate than in the COVID-19 crisis. While paradox scholars have predominantly been occupied with understanding leaders’ actions to make a paradox salient (Knight & Paroutis, 2017; Pradies et al., 2020), the paradoxical tensions heightened by COVID-19 such as ‘standing apart together’ have highlighted that we should not solely examine leaders. We need to unpack the relationship between leaders and followers as well as the mechanisms that sustain this relationship. This is particularly the case in a context, where people are expected to cooperate, while being physically dispersed. Paradox
theory offers insights as well as sensemaking and decision-making resources for leaders, yet paradox leadership in theory and practice must include paradox followership and followers’ resonance in order to understand and facilitate collective action during times of crises, grand challenges and continuous change in a VUCA-world.
AB - The communication from leaders during a time of crisis significantly impacts how the crisis unfolds. Leaders also play a decisive role in fostering either virtuous or vicious dynamics when organizations are torn between competing demands (Smith, 2014). But never has it been more pressing for organizational leaders to be mindful of what and how they communicate than in the COVID-19 crisis. While paradox scholars have predominantly been occupied with understanding leaders’ actions to make a paradox salient (Knight & Paroutis, 2017; Pradies et al., 2020), the paradoxical tensions heightened by COVID-19 such as ‘standing apart together’ have highlighted that we should not solely examine leaders. We need to unpack the relationship between leaders and followers as well as the mechanisms that sustain this relationship. This is particularly the case in a context, where people are expected to cooperate, while being physically dispersed. Paradox
theory offers insights as well as sensemaking and decision-making resources for leaders, yet paradox leadership in theory and practice must include paradox followership and followers’ resonance in order to understand and facilitate collective action during times of crises, grand challenges and continuous change in a VUCA-world.
M3 - Journal article
JO - Journal of Management Inquiry
JF - Journal of Management Inquiry
SN - 1056-4926
ER -