Extended oral anticoagulation after incident venous thromboembolism - a paradigm shift?

Ida Ehlers Albertsen, Gregory Piazza, Mette Søgaard, Peter Brønnum Nielsen, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReview (oversigtsartikel)peer review

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with incident venous thromboembolism carry a chronic risk of suffering a recurrent event. Anticoagulation is effective at preventing recurrence during treatment but also associated with risk of bleeding. Hence, the dilemma of optimal anticoagulant treatment duration beyond the acute treatment phase remains a clinical challenge in the management of venous thromboembolism.Areas covered: This review summarizes the current evidence for extended oral anticoagulant treatment after incident venous thromboembolism, and discusses dilemmas involved in treatment decisions related to extended secondary prevention.Expert opinion: Results from landmark venous thromboembolism-extended treatment studies focused on direct oral anticoagulants suggest a paradigm shift of the risk-benefit balance in favor of extended anticoagulant treatment. Nevertheless, patient preferences need to be considered while persistent concerns about enduring risk of bleeding must be addressed for the new paradigm to be implemented into clinical practice.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)201-208
Antal sider8
ISSN1477-9072
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2020

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Extended oral anticoagulation after incident venous thromboembolism - a paradigm shift?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater