Thermal Comfort in Offices - Natural Ventilation vs. Air-Conditioning.

Runa Tabea Hellwig*, Sabine Brasche, Wolfgang Bischof

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference proceedingKonferenceartikel i proceedingForskningpeer review

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Based on both subjective and objective data, a study was carried out in order to identify differences in the perception of thermal comfort of office workers in naturally ventilated and air-conditioned buildings. The analysis of the interviews shows that occupants of naturally ventilated office buildings are significantly more satisfied with their thermal environment than occupants in air-conditioned buildings. Several perceived parameters influence ther¬mal com¬fort: lighting, draughts, temperature variations, acoustics, olfactory quality, glare and perceived control as well as for air which is perceived as stale and dry. The impact of these parameters depends on the type of ventilation and the perception of the indoor temperature (hot or cool). The closest agree¬ment between predictions and subjective perception of thermal comfort for air-conditioned offices is achieved by Mayer’s modification of the PMV-Model. For naturally ventilated offices the ASHRAE ap¬proach shows the best match.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelProceedings Windsor Conference, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, 27.-30. April 2006
Antal sider11
ForlagNetwork for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, http://nceub.org.uk
Publikationsdato2006
Artikelnummer61
StatusUdgivet - 2006
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Thermal Comfort in Offices - Natural Ventilation vs. Air-Conditioning.'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater