Greening Flood Protection—An Interactive Knowledge Arrangement Perspective

Stephanie K.H. Janssen*, Jan P.M. van Tatenhove, Henriëtte S. Otter, Arthur P.J. Mol

*Corresponding author

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In flood protection, the dominant paradigm of ‘building hard structures’ is being challenged by approaches that integrate ecosystem dynamics and are ‘nature-based’. Knowledge development and policy ambitions on greening flood protection (GFP) are rapidly growing, but a deficit remains in actual full-scale implementation. Knowledge is a key barrier for implementation. To analyse conditions for the implementation of GFP, a knowledge-arrangement perspective is developed. The knowledge-arrangement perspective is applied on a case study of successful implementation of GFP in the Netherlands, the pilot Sand Engine Delfland, a large-scale (21.5 Mm3) sand nourishment project. This project confirms that an integrated knowledge arrangement enables GFP as it allows for multifunctionality. Effectiveness of the integrated arrangement in this project is explained by its ‘flexible’ nature providing ample design space. This was possible because core values in flood protection and nature were not part of the integrated arrangement. More generally the case study demonstrates the difficulties of implementing GFP in existing mainstream flood protection routines. These are not (yet) geared to incorporate uncertainty, dynamics and multifunctionality, characteristics associated with GFP. The Sand Engine project can be regarded as a ‘field laboratory’ of physical and institutional learning and an innovation for mainstream flood protection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Volume17
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)309-331
Number of pages23
ISSN1523-908X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2015

Fingerprint

sand
engine
flood protection
ecosystem dynamics
innovation
learning
project
policy
laboratory

Keywords

  • Flood protection
  • nature protection
  • policy arrangements
  • Sand Engine
  • the Netherlands

Cite this

Janssen, Stephanie K.H. ; van Tatenhove, Jan P.M. ; Otter, Henriëtte S. ; Mol, Arthur P.J. / Greening Flood Protection—An Interactive Knowledge Arrangement Perspective. In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 309-331.
@article{db0bb795e0064d078347d5772de56744,
title = "Greening Flood Protection—An Interactive Knowledge Arrangement Perspective",
abstract = "In flood protection, the dominant paradigm of ‘building hard structures’ is being challenged by approaches that integrate ecosystem dynamics and are ‘nature-based’. Knowledge development and policy ambitions on greening flood protection (GFP) are rapidly growing, but a deficit remains in actual full-scale implementation. Knowledge is a key barrier for implementation. To analyse conditions for the implementation of GFP, a knowledge-arrangement perspective is developed. The knowledge-arrangement perspective is applied on a case study of successful implementation of GFP in the Netherlands, the pilot Sand Engine Delfland, a large-scale (21.5 Mm3) sand nourishment project. This project confirms that an integrated knowledge arrangement enables GFP as it allows for multifunctionality. Effectiveness of the integrated arrangement in this project is explained by its ‘flexible’ nature providing ample design space. This was possible because core values in flood protection and nature were not part of the integrated arrangement. More generally the case study demonstrates the difficulties of implementing GFP in existing mainstream flood protection routines. These are not (yet) geared to incorporate uncertainty, dynamics and multifunctionality, characteristics associated with GFP. The Sand Engine project can be regarded as a ‘field laboratory’ of physical and institutional learning and an innovation for mainstream flood protection.",
keywords = "Flood protection, nature protection, policy arrangements, Sand Engine, the Netherlands",
author = "Janssen, {Stephanie K.H.} and {van Tatenhove}, {Jan P.M.} and Otter, {Henri{\"e}tte S.} and Mol, {Arthur P.J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/1523908X.2014.947921",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "309--331",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning",
issn = "1523-908X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Greening Flood Protection—An Interactive Knowledge Arrangement Perspective. / Janssen, Stephanie K.H.; van Tatenhove, Jan P.M.; Otter, Henriëtte S.; Mol, Arthur P.J.

In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 17, No. 3, 27.05.2015, p. 309-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greening Flood Protection—An Interactive Knowledge Arrangement Perspective

AU - Janssen, Stephanie K.H.

AU - van Tatenhove, Jan P.M.

AU - Otter, Henriëtte S.

AU - Mol, Arthur P.J.

PY - 2015/5/27

Y1 - 2015/5/27

N2 - In flood protection, the dominant paradigm of ‘building hard structures’ is being challenged by approaches that integrate ecosystem dynamics and are ‘nature-based’. Knowledge development and policy ambitions on greening flood protection (GFP) are rapidly growing, but a deficit remains in actual full-scale implementation. Knowledge is a key barrier for implementation. To analyse conditions for the implementation of GFP, a knowledge-arrangement perspective is developed. The knowledge-arrangement perspective is applied on a case study of successful implementation of GFP in the Netherlands, the pilot Sand Engine Delfland, a large-scale (21.5 Mm3) sand nourishment project. This project confirms that an integrated knowledge arrangement enables GFP as it allows for multifunctionality. Effectiveness of the integrated arrangement in this project is explained by its ‘flexible’ nature providing ample design space. This was possible because core values in flood protection and nature were not part of the integrated arrangement. More generally the case study demonstrates the difficulties of implementing GFP in existing mainstream flood protection routines. These are not (yet) geared to incorporate uncertainty, dynamics and multifunctionality, characteristics associated with GFP. The Sand Engine project can be regarded as a ‘field laboratory’ of physical and institutional learning and an innovation for mainstream flood protection.

AB - In flood protection, the dominant paradigm of ‘building hard structures’ is being challenged by approaches that integrate ecosystem dynamics and are ‘nature-based’. Knowledge development and policy ambitions on greening flood protection (GFP) are rapidly growing, but a deficit remains in actual full-scale implementation. Knowledge is a key barrier for implementation. To analyse conditions for the implementation of GFP, a knowledge-arrangement perspective is developed. The knowledge-arrangement perspective is applied on a case study of successful implementation of GFP in the Netherlands, the pilot Sand Engine Delfland, a large-scale (21.5 Mm3) sand nourishment project. This project confirms that an integrated knowledge arrangement enables GFP as it allows for multifunctionality. Effectiveness of the integrated arrangement in this project is explained by its ‘flexible’ nature providing ample design space. This was possible because core values in flood protection and nature were not part of the integrated arrangement. More generally the case study demonstrates the difficulties of implementing GFP in existing mainstream flood protection routines. These are not (yet) geared to incorporate uncertainty, dynamics and multifunctionality, characteristics associated with GFP. The Sand Engine project can be regarded as a ‘field laboratory’ of physical and institutional learning and an innovation for mainstream flood protection.

KW - Flood protection

KW - nature protection

KW - policy arrangements

KW - Sand Engine

KW - the Netherlands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028204389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1523908X.2014.947921

DO - 10.1080/1523908X.2014.947921

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85028204389

VL - 17

SP - 309

EP - 331

JO - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

JF - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

SN - 1523-908X

IS - 3

ER -