TY - GEN
T1 - On Network Embedding for Machine Learning on Road Networks: A Case Study on the Danish Road Network
AU - Jepsen, Tobias S.
AU - Jensen, Christian Søndergaard
AU - Nielsen, Thomas Dyhre
AU - Torp, Kristian
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Road networks are a type of spatial network, whereedges may be associated with qualitative information such asroad type and speed limit. Unfortunately, such information isoften incomplete; for instance, OpenStreetMap only has speedlimits for 13% of all Danish road segments. This is problematicfor analysis tasks that rely on such information for machinelearning. To enable machine learning in such circumstances, onemay consider the application of network embedding methods toextract structural information from the network. However, thesemethods have so far mostly been used in the context of socialnetworks, which differ significantly from road networks in termsof, e.g., node degree and level of homophily (which are key tothe performance of many network embedding methods).We analyze the use of network embedding methods, specifically node2vec, for learning road segment embeddings in roadnetworks. Due to the often limited availability of informationon other relevant road characteristics, the analysis focuses onleveraging the spatial network structure. Our results suggest thatnetwork embedding methods can indeed be used for derivingrelevant network features (that may, e.g, be used for predictingspeed limits), but that the qualities of the embeddings differ fromembeddings for social networks.
AB - Road networks are a type of spatial network, whereedges may be associated with qualitative information such asroad type and speed limit. Unfortunately, such information isoften incomplete; for instance, OpenStreetMap only has speedlimits for 13% of all Danish road segments. This is problematicfor analysis tasks that rely on such information for machinelearning. To enable machine learning in such circumstances, onemay consider the application of network embedding methods toextract structural information from the network. However, thesemethods have so far mostly been used in the context of socialnetworks, which differ significantly from road networks in termsof, e.g., node degree and level of homophily (which are key tothe performance of many network embedding methods).We analyze the use of network embedding methods, specifically node2vec, for learning road segment embeddings in roadnetworks. Due to the often limited availability of informationon other relevant road characteristics, the analysis focuses onleveraging the spatial network structure. Our results suggest thatnetwork embedding methods can indeed be used for derivingrelevant network features (that may, e.g, be used for predictingspeed limits), but that the qualities of the embeddings differ fromembeddings for social networks.
KW - road network
KW - machine learning
KW - feature learning
KW - network embedding
UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8622416
U2 - 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622416
DO - 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622416
M3 - Article in proceeding
SP - 3421
EP - 3430
BT - Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data
PB - IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
T2 - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data
Y2 - 10 December 2018 through 13 December 2018
ER -