Projects per year
Abstract
The article analyses how the programmatic structure of welfare schemes in Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany shape public perceptions of and preferences for migrants’ entitlement to social benefits and services. First, the article finds that despite high complexity and the presence of some severe misconceptions, the entitlement criteria of migrants within existing social benefits and services do shape public perceptions of reality. Second, the article finds that these institutional shaped perceptions of reality strongly influence preferences for how migrants’ entitlement criteria should be. This status quo effect is more moderate among populist right-wing voters, in general, and in the critical case of attitudes to non-EU migrants’ entitlement to social assistance in Denmark. However, in all segments, one finds strong correlations between ‘are’ and ‘should be’, which is taken as indications of clear and sizeable institutional effects.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of European Social Policy |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 48-62 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISSN | 0958-9287 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Institutionalism
- migration
- welfare chauvinism
- welfare nationalism
- welfare state
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
MIFARE: Migrants’ Welfare State Attitudes
Larsen, C. A. (Project Participant), Lubbers, M. (Project Manager), Diehl, C. (Project Participant) & Hedegaard, T. F. (Project Participant)
01/02/2015 → 31/01/2018
Project: Research