The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

542 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

The article analyses how the programmatic structure of welfare schemes in Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany shape public perceptions of and preferences for migrants’ entitlement to social benefits and services. Firstly, the article finds that despite high complexity and the presence of some severe misperceptions, the entitlement criteria of migrants within existing social benefits and services do shape public perceptions of reality. Secondly, the article finds that these institutional shaped perceptions of reality strongly influence preferences for how migrants’ entitlement criteria should be. This status quo effect is more moderate among populist right-wing voters, in general, and in the critical case of attitudes to non-EU-migrants’ entitlement to social assistance in Denmark. However, in all segments, one finds strong correlations between “are” and “should be”, which is taken as indications of clear and sizeable institutional effects.
OriginalsprogDansk
TidsskriftJournal of European Social Policy
ISSN0958-9287
StatusAccepteret/In press - 2019

Emneord

  • Welfare nationalism
  • welfare chauvinism
  • migration

Citer dette

@article{e6f4983f494b400d8b2c696d4512c355,
title = "The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services",
abstract = "The article analyses how the programmatic structure of welfare schemes in Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany shape public perceptions of and preferences for migrants’ entitlement to social benefits and services. Firstly, the article finds that despite high complexity and the presence of some severe misperceptions, the entitlement criteria of migrants within existing social benefits and services do shape public perceptions of reality. Secondly, the article finds that these institutional shaped perceptions of reality strongly influence preferences for how migrants’ entitlement criteria should be. This status quo effect is more moderate among populist right-wing voters, in general, and in the critical case of attitudes to non-EU-migrants’ entitlement to social assistance in Denmark. However, in all segments, one finds strong correlations between “are” and “should be”, which is taken as indications of clear and sizeable institutional effects.",
keywords = "Welfare nationalism, welfare chauvinism, migration",
author = "Larsen, {Christian Albrekt}",
year = "2019",
language = "Dansk",
journal = "Journal of European Social Policy",
issn = "0958-9287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services. / Larsen, Christian Albrekt.

I: Journal of European Social Policy, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services

AU - Larsen, Christian Albrekt

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The article analyses how the programmatic structure of welfare schemes in Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany shape public perceptions of and preferences for migrants’ entitlement to social benefits and services. Firstly, the article finds that despite high complexity and the presence of some severe misperceptions, the entitlement criteria of migrants within existing social benefits and services do shape public perceptions of reality. Secondly, the article finds that these institutional shaped perceptions of reality strongly influence preferences for how migrants’ entitlement criteria should be. This status quo effect is more moderate among populist right-wing voters, in general, and in the critical case of attitudes to non-EU-migrants’ entitlement to social assistance in Denmark. However, in all segments, one finds strong correlations between “are” and “should be”, which is taken as indications of clear and sizeable institutional effects.

AB - The article analyses how the programmatic structure of welfare schemes in Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany shape public perceptions of and preferences for migrants’ entitlement to social benefits and services. Firstly, the article finds that despite high complexity and the presence of some severe misperceptions, the entitlement criteria of migrants within existing social benefits and services do shape public perceptions of reality. Secondly, the article finds that these institutional shaped perceptions of reality strongly influence preferences for how migrants’ entitlement criteria should be. This status quo effect is more moderate among populist right-wing voters, in general, and in the critical case of attitudes to non-EU-migrants’ entitlement to social assistance in Denmark. However, in all segments, one finds strong correlations between “are” and “should be”, which is taken as indications of clear and sizeable institutional effects.

KW - Welfare nationalism

KW - welfare chauvinism

KW - migration

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

JO - Journal of European Social Policy

JF - Journal of European Social Policy

SN - 0958-9287

ER -