Resumé

It is commonly assumed that there are differences in physicians’ and caregivers’ ethical attitudes towards clinical situations. The assumption is that the difference is driven by different values, views and judgements in specific situations. At Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, we aimed to investigate these assumptions by conducting a large quantitative study. The study design, based on the Factorial Survey Method, was a carefully constructed survey with 50 questions designed to test which factors influenced the respondents’ ethical reasoning. The factors were clustered into three categories of ethical reasoning and values. The categories were formulated in terms of easily recognizable ethical positions: consequential ethics, deontological ethics and relational ethics. Based on 2129 respondents, we found significant support for the assumption of differences between physicians and caregivers. The group of caregivers favoured the relational ethics view in clinical ethical situations, and the group of physicians favoured the position of deontological ethics.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Ethics
Vol/bind13
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)209-219
Antal sider11
ISSN1477-7509
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 dec. 2018

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Ethical Theory
Ethics
Physicians
Denmark
Surveys and Questionnaires
Clinical Practice

Emneord

    Citer dette

    @article{38a41c64ec5e4bc980efe380e5f8c62a,
    title = "Physicians and caregivers do differ in ethical attitudes to daily clinical practice",
    abstract = "It is commonly assumed that there are differences in physicians’ and caregivers’ ethical attitudes towards clinical situations. The assumption is that the difference is driven by different values, views and judgements in specific situations. At Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, we aimed to investigate these assumptions by conducting a large quantitative study. The study design, based on the Factorial Survey Method, was a carefully constructed survey with 50 questions designed to test which factors influenced the respondents’ ethical reasoning. The factors were clustered into three categories of ethical reasoning and values. The categories were formulated in terms of easily recognizable ethical positions: consequential ethics, deontological ethics and relational ethics. Based on 2129 respondents, we found significant support for the assumption of differences between physicians and caregivers. The group of caregivers favoured the relational ethics view in clinical ethical situations, and the group of physicians favoured the position of deontological ethics.",
    keywords = "Clinical ethics, professional ethics in medicine, professional ethics in nursing, quantitative study",
    author = "Tell{\'e}us, {Patrik Kj{\ae}rsdam} and Holdgaard, {Dorte M{\o}ller} and Birthe Th{\o}rring",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1477750918790005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "209--219",
    journal = "Clinical Ethics",
    issn = "1477-7509",
    publisher = "Sage",
    number = "4",

    }

    Physicians and caregivers do differ in ethical attitudes to daily clinical practice. / Telléus, Patrik Kjærsdam; Holdgaard, Dorte Møller; Thørring, Birthe.

    I: Clinical Ethics, Bind 13, Nr. 4, 01.12.2018, s. 209-219.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Physicians and caregivers do differ in ethical attitudes to daily clinical practice

    AU - Telléus, Patrik Kjærsdam

    AU - Holdgaard, Dorte Møller

    AU - Thørring, Birthe

    PY - 2018/12/1

    Y1 - 2018/12/1

    N2 - It is commonly assumed that there are differences in physicians’ and caregivers’ ethical attitudes towards clinical situations. The assumption is that the difference is driven by different values, views and judgements in specific situations. At Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, we aimed to investigate these assumptions by conducting a large quantitative study. The study design, based on the Factorial Survey Method, was a carefully constructed survey with 50 questions designed to test which factors influenced the respondents’ ethical reasoning. The factors were clustered into three categories of ethical reasoning and values. The categories were formulated in terms of easily recognizable ethical positions: consequential ethics, deontological ethics and relational ethics. Based on 2129 respondents, we found significant support for the assumption of differences between physicians and caregivers. The group of caregivers favoured the relational ethics view in clinical ethical situations, and the group of physicians favoured the position of deontological ethics.

    AB - It is commonly assumed that there are differences in physicians’ and caregivers’ ethical attitudes towards clinical situations. The assumption is that the difference is driven by different values, views and judgements in specific situations. At Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, we aimed to investigate these assumptions by conducting a large quantitative study. The study design, based on the Factorial Survey Method, was a carefully constructed survey with 50 questions designed to test which factors influenced the respondents’ ethical reasoning. The factors were clustered into three categories of ethical reasoning and values. The categories were formulated in terms of easily recognizable ethical positions: consequential ethics, deontological ethics and relational ethics. Based on 2129 respondents, we found significant support for the assumption of differences between physicians and caregivers. The group of caregivers favoured the relational ethics view in clinical ethical situations, and the group of physicians favoured the position of deontological ethics.

    KW - Clinical ethics

    KW - professional ethics in medicine

    KW - professional ethics in nursing

    KW - quantitative study

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052537380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1477750918790005

    DO - 10.1177/1477750918790005

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 13

    SP - 209

    EP - 219

    JO - Clinical Ethics

    JF - Clinical Ethics

    SN - 1477-7509

    IS - 4

    ER -