Power resource theory for contemporary society: A research framework

Jens Arnholtz, Bjarke Refslund

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The opening chapter outlines the propositions and core elements of power resource theory. The theory’s basic casual argument is that societal development is driven primarily by the power struggles and the configurations of power between workers and employers. At the same time, understanding the power relations that drive societal change is complex in contemporary societies because workers and employers have become more diversified categories and the types of power resources they can mobilise are multiple. The chapter, therefore, offers a generic definition of power that can accommodate different types of power resources, before defining five types of power resources: structural, associational, institutional, ideational, and coalitional. Additionally, some theoretical propositions that shape and clarify the theory are outlined. The chapter also highlights how the interests and power of workers and employers are contingent on historically specific circumstances. Workers’ interests are hence not homogeneous (nor are employers’), and the distribution of power resources may deter actors from engaging in overt conflict. Therefore, power resource theory also offers a theory for explaining why workers and employers may cooperate but without assuming that the underlying antagonism between them has disappeared.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWorkers, Power and Society : Power Resource Theory in Contemporary Capitalism
EditorsJens Arnholtz, Bjarke Refslund
Number of pages31
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherRoutledge
Publication dateJun 2024
Edition1
Pages1-31
Chapter1
ISBN (Print)9781032547862
ISBN (Electronic)9781040030196
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024
SeriesRoutledge Research in Employment Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power resource theory for contemporary society: A research framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this