Why does the pathologization of grief cause such a stir? A comment on Bergsmark and Ramsing

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

After years of debate, a new diagnosis called prolonged grief disorder (PGD) was finally included in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; World Health Organization). The pathologization of grief has been controversial and caused quite a stir among researchers, practitioners, and the general public. Recently, Bergsmark and Ramsing (2023) have addressed some considerations that they believe are lost in the ensuing debate, and they call for a positive response to the diagnosis among psychologists. In this reply, I argue that we have good reasons to maintain a critical stance both toward the specific grief diagnosis and toward the general pathologization of human suffering.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTheory & Psychology
Volume33
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)873-878
Number of pages6
ISSN0959-3543
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • grief
  • pathologization
  • prolonged grief disorder
  • psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why does the pathologization of grief cause such a stir? A comment on Bergsmark and Ramsing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this