TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethical dilemmas in conducting qualitative, public health research on social media
T2 - using a study on Facebook as a case
AU - SØRENSEN, JANE BRANDT
AU - THOMASSEN, JACOB LAUGE
AU - MEYROWITSCH, DAN W.
AU - KINGOD, NATASSIA ROSEWOOD
AU - KONRADSEN, FLEMMING
AU - PLOUG, THOMAS
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Aim: Platforms on social media are increasingly used for public health research. While social media provides an exceptional opportunity to explore communication about public health topics, this practice is not without ethical dilemmas. Our aim was to identify and unfold some of these dilemmas and to suggest possible solutions and ways forward for future research. Methods: Using our own research within a closed forum for people experiencing suicidal thoughts as a case, we explored certain dilemmas and possible answers relating to whether what is to be researched falls under a public or private social media domain; we investigated avenues for obtaining access to participants in an evolving online environment; how to secure informed consent from participants; and ways of ensuring anonymity. Results: We provide recommendations and reflections that we hope will offer inspiration for researchers embarking on similar social media public health research within and beyond suicide research. Conclusions: The ethical framework commonly referred to in health research, based on confidentiality, anonymity, informed consent and doing no harm must be adjusted to be relevant for a social media context where technologies and regulations are constantly being altered.
AB - Aim: Platforms on social media are increasingly used for public health research. While social media provides an exceptional opportunity to explore communication about public health topics, this practice is not without ethical dilemmas. Our aim was to identify and unfold some of these dilemmas and to suggest possible solutions and ways forward for future research. Methods: Using our own research within a closed forum for people experiencing suicidal thoughts as a case, we explored certain dilemmas and possible answers relating to whether what is to be researched falls under a public or private social media domain; we investigated avenues for obtaining access to participants in an evolving online environment; how to secure informed consent from participants; and ways of ensuring anonymity. Results: We provide recommendations and reflections that we hope will offer inspiration for researchers embarking on similar social media public health research within and beyond suicide research. Conclusions: The ethical framework commonly referred to in health research, based on confidentiality, anonymity, informed consent and doing no harm must be adjusted to be relevant for a social media context where technologies and regulations are constantly being altered.
KW - code of conduct
KW - ethics
KW - Social media
KW - suicide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181501509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/14034948231219725
DO - 10.1177/14034948231219725
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85181501509
SN - 1403-4948
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
ER -